Permettant de réserver des droits dans plusieurs pays à la fois po.

Is this the end of European conglomerates? March 22, 2018. Is this the end of European conglomerates? The end may be in sight for European conglomerates. Activist investor Christer Gardell of Cevian Capital. Predicts a growing trend of demergers in the next five to seven years, due in large part to an increasing number of European conglomerates engaging in in spin-off transactions, or spin-offs. The growing list of spin-offs in Europe.

On March 18, 2018. SARB announces establishment of Fintech programme. Voting against a business rescue plan. Reciprocal performance under reciprocal contracts. On February 26, 2018.

Norton Rose Fulbright, LLP. Rights of minority Lenders under APLMA and LMA documents.

Glossary of social media sites. To our Social Media Law Bulletin subscribers. Our Social Media Law Bulletin team has been contributing articles on legal issues in social media since 2012. UK MPs consider social media terms and conditions too complex.

Forum selection by-laws come to Canada. Norton Rose Fulbright Canada has recently been involved in the introduction and adoption of forum selection by-laws in Canada. This article will provide a brief description of forum selection by-laws and their benefits and uses. For a more in-depth analysis, we invite readers to watch the replay of the talk. Or reach out to the chairs of our Special Situations Team.

FDA is keeping up with Kim Kardashian. On August 12, 2015. In her social media post, also posted on Facebook, Kardashian discussed the drug Diclegis and the positive effect she claims it has had on her morning sickness. On August 13, 2015.

Recent consumer products case law. Posted in Consumer class actions,. Recent consumer products case law,. Following up on our recent post.

The Long Arm of Canadian Privacy Law.

District Court holds that IPR estoppel does not apply to grounds denied institution on the merits. Shaw Industries Group, Inc. Automated Creel Systems, Inc. Which we wrote about here. In which the court held that IPR grounds denied as redundant were not subject to estoppel because the statute applies only to grounds that were raised or could have been raised.